A Structured Methodology for Handling Project Disputes

Technical Rigor with a Senior Executive Viewpoint

When construction disputes arise, the traditional response often compounds the problem: work slows, documentation gaps widen, and positions harden.

Project Neutral® is fundamentally different — a seasoned executive and a structured methodology that addresses issues while maintaining project momentum.

The Project Neutral® methodology combines sophisticated analytical tools with practical construction experience. This dual focus ensures our evaluations are both technically sound and practically implementable.

Project Documents

Our document review process uses a structured framework that:

  • Evaluates contractual relationships and obligations

  • Assesses technical compliance with specifications

  • Identifies critical path impacts through schedule analysis

  • Reviews change order processes and documentation

  • Analyzes cost impacts and financial implications

This framework is applied by professionals with decades of industry experience, ensuring technical analysis is grounded in practical understanding of construction operations.

Confidential Interviews

A Project Neutral® will conduct interviews with stakeholders across the whole team in order to:

  • Gather essential factual information without escalating tensions

  • Identify areas of agreement that can serve as foundations for resolution

  • Understand technical perspectives from multiple viewpoints

  • Clarify documentation gaps or ambiguities

  • Explore potential solutions beyond positional arguments

Technical Analysis

The Project Neutral® team applies specialized expertise in:

  • Design and engineering documents

  • Critical path scheduling and delay analysis

  • Change order evaluation and pricing

  • Construction means and methods assessment

  • Mitigation steps and acceleration approaches

  • Risk allocation and management

Implementation Guidance

Beyond analysis, we provide practical guidance for implementation, including:

  • Structured negotiation frameworks

  • Exchange of documents appropriate for resolution

  • Process improvements to prevent recurrence

  • Improved communication guidance for stakeholders

  • Project recovery strategies where needed